From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 09:44:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9AB16A46B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:44:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asmrookie@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1858413C45D for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:44:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asmrookie@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so1775413mue for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:44:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=KdH2AfHkSOzBjb4wAzaw8a3mFewTxuyCkChHnOJod6hw+IJAazFJW+kxIzlid52GeNL3U4WcO2v/RgjTA1phHf9zoEx0R7klYbZR0bF/K/KSsmy4euB+0nuVLH675K6vsC9b7Wh44ye6y6yVV8GBivSGl3S+mJ4tIVqDjg5bfyA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=BC/9MfxRqBbXFvH1d+losPCZ3H+VoSjywi0oDwufl3y3zTycewNRTFA27IftNoEqN7nS7o6WHBlcEcc33jW9F18A9Mea2kbCDkriNxc51dbBTHeSyAnMxt83Fac7212foDMdm83/lpLd1ZsJJ8Wt4liksLaeXA++qPAZ5rhLK8s= Received: by 10.82.189.6 with SMTP id m6mr7710163buf.1181036691284; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:44:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?172.31.5.25? ( [89.97.252.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i7sm1393102nfh.2007.06.05.02.44.50; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:44:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46653084.7080502@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:44:36 +0200 From: Attilio Rao User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060526) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri References: <499c70c0706041119o6c290fb3k7f234492df2f6548@mail.gmail.com> <499c70c0706041441q4d4f13adtebd979ec87f71558@mail.gmail.com> <466488F0.9070802@FreeBSD.org> <499c70c0706041456x1a448348mec7410678c1f1d7d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <499c70c0706041456x1a448348mec7410678c1f1d7d@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Attilio Rao Cc: "youshi10@u.washington.edu" , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel C2D COREs not used equally in FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: attilio@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:44:53 -0000 Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > Attilio, > > Thanks for explaining the issue deeper. > > So is fixing this issue would make FreeBSD runs apps faster than Linux > or we will get the same result that linux offers now? This is not intended to improve the quickness of a program per-se (I'm not saying it is impossible to happen, just that it would be a side effect), but it is intended to improve scalabilty. I expect a very good boost up on scalabilty for us by these jeff's efforts, but quantify now is not very simple. Time will say better than me. Attilio