From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 30 21:41:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10D616A41F for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:41:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@childeric.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD38643D86 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:41:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@childeric.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.10.60] ([82.35.116.100]) by smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:42:10 +0000 Message-ID: <438E1C39.7000905@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:40:09 +0000 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <84dead720511280545v2bc0bc35jd107da06b9a788cb@mail.gmail.com> <20187843-76FC-4EAB-AFF8-7493FB0C0077@anduin.net> <84dead720511280654j138635abgcb9cc0978e6c26b7@mail.gmail.com> <02757598-222D-408E-8B33-C2EE1E6E426E@anduin.net> <20051128211440.GB28963@xor.obsecurity.org> <3A601A32-94D1-49F6-AB06-ED54D50D4B6A@anduin.net> <20051128235911.GA31669@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051129094531.Y23958@anduin.net> <20051129091533.GA41885@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051129103719.GB43032@xor.obsecurity.org> <460BE48B-594F-4450-AFA7-1652B7C6800A@anduin.net> In-Reply-To: <460BE48B-594F-4450-AFA7-1652B7C6800A@anduin.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Nov 2005 21:42:10.0093 (UTC) FILETIME=[EADB55D0:01C5F5F6] Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reduced java/tomcat performance 6-beta3 -> 6-stable ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:41:27 -0000 >>>> Clearly they're not 100% equal, but (100-epsilon)%. Your job is to >>>> identify the origin of the epsilon :-) >>> >>> >>> Yea yea ;) Working on it.. >>> Is there a way to force ACPI-safe on the slower system? > > I'm upgrading BIOSes on both boxes now, even though they seem equal. > Then I'll see what ACPI debug output shows me. If you have any other > hints or ideas, please let me know... thanks so far. I missed the beginning of this thread so sorry if this is impractical or stupid suggestion but could you swap hard disks between machines? At least that might tell you if it is a hardware/bios or operating system problem. Chris