From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 11 01:36:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826A516A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 01:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.10.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDF843D3F for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 01:36:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from xdivac02@eva.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i3B8aCKD064185 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 10:36:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.12.11/8.12.5/Submit) id i3B8aCMu064184 for current@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 10:36:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 10:36:11 +0200 From: Divacky Roman To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040411083611.GA63990@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <11095.1081621779@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <11095.1081621779@critter.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 05:44:56 -0700 Subject: Re: Optimizing RCng execution speed ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 08:36:17 -0000 On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 08:29:39PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > Is anybody working on optimizing RCng execution speed ? > > I think our boottime is getting a bit too slow these days... RCng uses dependancies so it naturally makes a graph where some nodes are independant of each other. what about executing this in parallel? just an idea roman