From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul 22 19:00:03 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257C5FAE;
 Mon, 22 Jul 2013 19:00:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from crodr001@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com (mail-la0-x22f.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4419E2EE0;
 Mon, 22 Jul 2013 19:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id fe20so5524241lab.20
 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
 :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=+S2YSubdM7jkzMXwiXCVOXe7QHiiMYCq7OQYlinWkpc=;
 b=ACTz9sTWiOWxzPhA6wOKRVsiEW5donWHbnXNw2ntm4U7pUieXcypx0rTT4+F3w6sGd
 pzfQaEFRGa9ro3IFbyuqzMM1wgZmrdyn8kgIcg2JXZqNoc7fRJseYTxKqD4vbgYthzFu
 eIZe02UBBn6GGeFBcfglKYNcummVtatqkzh61dRCLghAA6n6oBgot5QK5n0bCfCY981A
 4pLw/yVY18GK1a2hQIIbYnCXV7FtgU36K2v1X2SDbeDSyVnQKGMyPvgaA4QjT7shC/Xi
 waCC3MH+GM7KkRiTsLGvvnR7JbWbx42yajtKtEBaxuldKerwJNz8GEYPDprxdPrs4Szy
 5pGQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.12.225 with SMTP id b1mr13000681lbc.3.1374519600114;
 Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: crodr001@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.149.38 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomAC573hrQivfT9Gn_tJn5SkMhM_MK8hUCbtr-7D-NGDw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAG=rPVfxFiOVOeSyDP=wBubNQCHK5dqcgBBaJjeS6XXtSZSZqg@mail.gmail.com>
 <51ED5308.3020008@gmx.com>
 <CAJ-VmomAC573hrQivfT9Gn_tJn5SkMhM_MK8hUCbtr-7D-NGDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:59:59 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: tp7sirbKL9vvGWx44PYvYdEp_CI
Message-ID: <CAG=rPVd3F2sfwizJuEngxexo0Rby2qwzqpAB4_K-fZXXb8-Rmw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: VIMAGE + PF crash in mbuf destructor
From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Cc: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>,
 freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports."
 <freebsd-virtualization.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-virtualization>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 19:00:03 -0000

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:

>
> I don't think the default vnet context is the correct behaviour there.
> We'd need to figure out what the vnet context of the mbuf is and set
> that.
>
>
What do you think about Marko's suggestion to de-virtualize
V_pf_mtag_z?  What would be the down side of that?

I don't understand enough of the PF code to understand which variables need
to
be virtual and which don't.

--
Craig