From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jan 31 19: 3:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from dante.naver.co.id (unknown [202.155.86.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E916137B67D for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 19:02:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by dante.naver.co.id (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6C10B537E9; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:02:55 +0700 (JAVT) Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:02:55 +0700 From: John Indra To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: -CURRENT and XFree86 4.0.2 problem Message-ID: <20010201100255.A69701@office.naver.co.id> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20010123101200.B542@naver.co.id> <20010131115547.C2268@webcom.it> <200101311336.f0VDaTk81098@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200101311336.f0VDaTk81098@freefall.freebsd.org>; from jmz@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 05:36:29AM -0800 X-Mailer: Mutt 1.2.5i on FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 05:36:29AM -0800, Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote: >Reverting to 4.0.1 is not a way to solve the problem. Someone running >-stable with a i810 chipset has to investigate the problem and >provide patches. I can't do it myself, not having a i810. >Is this a problem with -stable only (i.e. does 4.0.2 works on >-RELEASE)? The i810 code has changed a lot between 4.0.1 and 4.0.2. XFree86 4.0.2 is broken for -CURRENT too... At least for Intel 81x chipsets... >Jean-Marc /john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message