From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 10 19:12:31 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A901316A4CE
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:12:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from deliver.smtp.vlink.ru (alias.rigel.internal.vlink.ru
	[217.23.88.17])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04A043D54
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:12:30 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dsh@vlink.ru)
Received: from smtp.smtp.vlink.ru (clamav.smtp.vlink.ru [192.168.4.1])
	by deliver.smtp.vlink.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A73B456E1;
	Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:12:29 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from neva.vlink.ru (neva.vlink.ru [217.107.252.29])
	by smtp.smtp.vlink.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E85E4530E;
	Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:12:29 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from neva.vlink.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by neva.vlink.ru (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2AJCTot014130;
	Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:12:29 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from dsh@vlink.ru)
Received: (from dsh@localhost)
	by neva.vlink.ru (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j2AJCS6l014127;
	Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:12:28 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from dsh@vlink.ru)
X-Comment-To: Andy Hilker
To: Andy Hilker <ah@crypta.net>
References: <200503091838.06322.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>
	<20050310004919.GA34206@hub.freebsd.org>
	<87ll8vn32j.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <20050310160852.GB1718@mail.crypta.net>
From: Denis Shaposhnikov <dsh@vlink.ru>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:12:28 +0300
In-Reply-To: <20050310160852.GB1718@mail.crypta.net> (Andy Hilker's message
 of "Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:08:53 +0100")
Message-ID: <87sm33z55v.fsf@neva.vlink.ru>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp,
 berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: the current status of nullfs, unionfs
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:12:31 -0000

>>>>> "Andy" == Andy Hilker <ah@crypta.net> writes:

 >> nullfs is absolutely useless for jail's because TOO slow.

 Andy> What do you mean exactly, how do you benchmark this?

Just ran build of databases/mysql41-server in a jail with nullfs
mounted /bin /sbin /lib etc over r/w nfs mounted sandbox.

-- 
DSS5-RIPE DSS-RIPN 2:550/5068@fidonet 2:550/5069@fidonet
mailto:dsh@vlink.ru http://neva.vlink.ru/~dsh/