From owner-cvs-all Tue Mar 13 0:14: 6 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.136]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492D937B718; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:14:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by phk.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA37955; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:13:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2D8EIp03796; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:14:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Greg Lehey Cc: Robert Watson , Warner Losh , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Core's function (was: The Project and onward [was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_output.c]) In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 13 Mar 2001 12:10:03 +1030." <20010313121002.F59348@wantadilla.lemis.com> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:14:17 +0100 Message-ID: <3794.984471257@critter> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20010313121002.F59348@wantadilla.lemis.com>, Greg Lehey writes: >> I'm not sure I like the idea of an architectural board per se, because I >> think that architectural discussions can work fine with our current >> forums. > >It took me longer than most to agree to this viewpoint, but I do now. >Yes, it's a good idea to have an architectural board, but why should >it be less than the committers as a whole? Because, sometimes getting 200 people to agree is just not possible, and yet a decision must be made. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message