From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 1 13:50:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73AE5106564A for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2009 13:50:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f206.google.com (mail-ew0-f206.google.com [209.85.219.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015D18FC12 for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2009 13:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by ewy2 with SMTP id 2so1979477ewy.43 for ; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 06:50:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ujyVNObcU/6sv+iowi0xC+oWGcfAAEDWTT0sfHwsZEA=; b=YebEGBAWKGucVWA2Fn/ubAQBfPehxQ/PzrTSsAP8LmKmhkKEpcBDhNW76j6MsA6Hp8 9F3duuk3XG6EtMHxzGILzfdctMPGniraGJFP8heKhjCI5mxEBmXnAJVY/gIbGXv57ODx xcHmxjY6/lcHWVUhJYD70A2ArXy0y54csH1EE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tfmSYy1ekTsVrxy4Bwv2mNKD8DXv+A/oCl8bjgkGnrao9/+R5FKGxrefLbfu/PvH0G GFy/7Sy/40SfZXLZNQt1bEoVFuw6ouXkTbI/5B605882LHH5q+j3pDI5XspNR3hnlWAQ mG4QS3qkzQTAnG/kcFu1l/yXLUyQzPeBl9cEQ= Received: by 10.210.78.16 with SMTP id a16mr4594422ebb.73.1249133081739; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 06:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm5385972eyf.58.2009.08.01.06.24.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 01 Aug 2009 06:24:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:24:38 +0100 From: RW To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090801142438.65cabd8d@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <4A740679.1020608@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20090731121249.538ea7e7.jasonh@DataIX.net> <20090731173636.GA76357@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <4A740679.1020608@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: ports/*/jpeg "Thanks a lot guys" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2009 13:50:08 -0000 On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 10:10:17 +0100 Matthew Seaman wrote: > The OP does have a valid point though. I just got an e-mail from > Freshports saying that a bunch of ports I maintain had had > PORTREVISION bumps because of the jpeg update. Which is all fine and > dandy, except that these were the www/p5-RT-* extension modules for > RT. > ... Actually, I think his point was that the ports were bumped too long after the jpeg update, when people had already done the recursive upgrade.