From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 16:57:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 989FCB77 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 16:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.scaleengine.net (beauharnois2.bhs1.scaleengine.net [142.4.218.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70BEA868 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 16:57:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (Seawolf.HML3.ScaleEngine.net [209.51.186.28]) (Authenticated sender: allanjude.freebsd@scaleengine.com) by mx1.scaleengine.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F92858D41 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 16:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <542ED572.2040008@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 12:57:22 -0400 From: Allan Jude User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VM unrestricted guest capability required References: <1412303890.698110582@f94.i.mail.ru> <1412310254.523165637@f125.i.mail.ru> <542E279D.8000804@freebsd.org> <1412312700.543372034@f141.i.mail.ru> <542ED2A4.1080009@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <542ED2A4.1080009@freebsd.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="74V8HXB5uePH0Qhld7oa6oSSopFr7AOWd" X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 16:57:04 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --74V8HXB5uePH0Qhld7oa6oSSopFr7AOWd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2014-10-03 12:45, Peter Grehan wrote: >> Are there any news/plans/progress with possibility to run Windows as >> guest? >=20 > Plans - most definitely. Progress - not a lot to report at this stage.= >=20 > later, >=20 > Peter. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" If/When bhyve gets the UEFI boot stuff to be able to do 'any OS' (from my understanding, this is the approach that will be used for Windows), would that remove the requirement for UG to boot Linux, if it was booted via UEFI? --=20 Allan Jude --74V8HXB5uePH0Qhld7oa6oSSopFr7AOWd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJULtV1AAoJEJrBFpNRJZKfL/0QAJhQkvRDI9nJMseOGGcOjyqG oRV/iNZgjc+qIOUKgi/5rIyynKWrxr41AhQktcJ4328pEUKFLR5uRExWllfcsfZy 433/IRLx4Bj+IcedbA8MXaxB1ZQnDMEsNGnzaw5s7vCGn7a4Q/WOMPEMPlw9XFod i/Q0ofn0OjG5snjRFupfu8efA9AFGr8jWGfLgOlAuFYIk3zzMR9SsLE6ZJ26DLek JcL+tOz0TZnk02BtdSGZlkdC+45c1ePM4v+rZi+TPb2RGjptZlJMsbd40yLA0bzl H+wAiuIhmygqum7CC2Mk/tAhXC3usu1ZdYL07UoMn26WWxIrlYI+iTuQIJ1emSTz r3c8wwbkbRiRuvGrlWZB5rXCFvsRT3QFT0UIRCgrSiMrZgLhOekjJ2WMNTW2vuLH KcG3+668C/yZzjQa+OTLV5jAjUzY20RxtA6Zi2hHsnz4EcMiDgmAL1JlZJj55eK8 pMnykWr6WtJFLxbbAyRaZvTcxLXCRsqAZXPT30oAcF8zG1idopkCoIR6KfawrKX6 2KQ6mT+nBnoKoWcn9Cc3Vb94nOfBPgOqHsUzLQog07wpscH3arc2jVfx8O6TyD2b NAA8avuqjyn1mHBS7dFXE5Xu98lZOvmeLPq6kwASSzq23ec6TFR/0O51yMgYFEIQ Y4z8EsYoatNILGwYF4Rh =eJlA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --74V8HXB5uePH0Qhld7oa6oSSopFr7AOWd--