From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 13:34:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: www@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB0C16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:34:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DD843D49 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:34:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with SMTP id k0DDYtJY031652; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:34:55 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 49B7811773; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:44:37 +0200 (EET) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:44:36 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Robert Levins Message-ID: <20060113024436.GA12163@flame.pc> References: <000d01c617c4$e96c3710$6b01a8c0@Dorothy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000d01c617c4$e96c3710$6b01a8c0@Dorothy> Cc: www@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bad link from handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:34:57 -0000 On 2006-01-12 16:09, Robert Levins wrote: > http://www%2efreebsd%2eorg/doc/en%5fUS.ISO8859%2d1/books/handbook/cvsup%2ehtml > > followed this link > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/net/cvsup-without-gui/pkg-descr > > from this location > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html > > did not find the linked information This is a known problem of the url.cgi script, when it interacts with the Ports tree. There is no "net/cvsup-without-gui/pkg-descr" file, because the net/cvsup-without-gui port is, basically, a wrapper that installs net/cvsup with options that disable its GUI. In a sense, this is not a broken link, but a bug of url.cgi. Thanks for reporting this though :)