From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Apr 13 17:21:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from woodstock.monkey.net (kronos-1-101.mdm.mkt.execpc.com [169.207.85.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D3214CBE for ; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 17:21:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hamilton@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woodstock.monkey.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59163152; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 19:18:48 -0500 (CDT) To: Brett Glass Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , junkmale@xtra.co.nz, Charles Henrich , advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Charles Henrich a Star? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 13 Apr 1999 17:56:14 MDT." <4.2.0.32.19990413175507.04df8100@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 19:18:48 -0500 From: Jon Hamilton Message-Id: <19990414001848.59163152@woodstock.monkey.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ -chat dropped from Cc: list ] } >> With all due respect, PR is not one of Jordan's strong points. } > } >With all due respect, *your kind* of PR is not one of my strong points } >and I hope to god it never is. That would be like deciding to become } >a divorce lawyer. :-) } } My kind of PR is EFFECTIVE PR. Your PR, which has burdened FreeBSD } for many years, has set the OS so far behind Linux in market share } and visibility that it may never catch up. Your kind of PR (at least as seen on the lists) may be effective, but the only thing it's effective _at_ is alienating people you're trying to convince and people you should be working with. -- Jon Hamilton hamilton@pobox.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message