From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 17 11:11:23 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA06617 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 17 Mar 1995 11:11:23 -0800 Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA06596; Fri, 17 Mar 1995 11:11:10 -0800 Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id MAA14839; Fri, 17 Mar 1995 12:14:53 -0700 Date: Fri, 17 Mar 1995 12:14:53 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199503171914.MAA14839@trout.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: "Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage" "Re: What programs use libreadline?" (Mar 17, 10:01pm) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: "Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage" Subject: Re: What programs use libreadline? Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > >I already explained that the copystring() routine is now deprecated > >according to all the comments in the code, so I would like to remove it > >from libreadline ... > > Sorry, I misunderstand you a bit. We don't have newest version > of gdb, it is 4.14. Correct. When we upgrade to it, I'd rather not have to have a ton of FreeBSD specific patches for the sources if possible. > I'll check -current gdb & readline to see, > what savestring does in both sources, but do you say that you already > have ld patch for it, or not? For the shared version, but not for the static version (in case anyone wants to compile it static). I use the static version for debugging the shlib code as it seems to work better than the shared version. :-) Nate