From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 14 05:44:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2134316A4CE for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 05:44:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135CC43D3F for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 05:44:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.196.44]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2004031413443901400gnvere>; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:44:39 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3C2CBE; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 08:44:39 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Thomas Vogt References: <4053584A.8030408@gmx.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 14 Mar 2004 08:44:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4053584A.8030408@gmx.net> Message-ID: <44ptbfo855.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: performance with less than 8% minfree X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:44:40 -0000 Thomas Vogt writes: > FreeBSD 4.9 man tunefs(8) explains in section "-m minfree" that by > default, 8% disk space is reserved for root. The man page also says > clearly that I'll lose performance if I reduce minfree. My mailserver > has one drive for the base system and a raid enviroment with 500GB > space for the users mailboxes. 8% of 500gb space is a lot of space > which I can't use anymore for my users mailboxes. > So if I set this minfree to < 8% is there any other option I have to > set that I don't lose too much performance. We're talking about a lot > of write procedures for small files. Not really. Note, however, that it's the actual free space that can cut into performance, rather than the minimum free setting. You will only take the hit when the disk is getting close to full.