From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 20 23:29:37 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9828B106564A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:29:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com
	[74.125.82.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C42C8FC15
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:29:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so1218368wyf.13
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:29:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=tjLzellQbuQGuZZSAL8Ndh3MGI1pqcfy8ard+LY++8w=;
	b=wOCYIBkR5Jwo4DAXU2AzdUsTQB5UcNMf5f8X9LoF3YT+UMzyCFu6ueNscjYz+tA4Zf
	lE67Uwv5OGFC6epwGOGHGcEutlVW8sCq0qwcOvnATCJ33SKbuD8N4+aVsUuC4cNwLga/
	YGROTZf/dI7wT3clImySEo880JXzKCjeMnwWE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	b=aeJ70plm6Tpko8TRiyPcIJtoDDVk3dpXZw1Mapiqdq9WsGlOngYhes8Mh+n5mlD2ZF
	qRnRSynXsKMhQmpkNlYk9PXnYr6GzkpiKSD1LErsgyaBzoN37NErIBrAW++G1DVCPmCa
	u1jpA2g8I+xfxdOG18Q2v5C9MySbdMIXksPio=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.132.70 with SMTP id a6mr3039112wbt.193.1295566176060; Thu,
	20 Jan 2011 15:29:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.59.201 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:29:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimmRcO2HLaZQ1SX9kmeByi-6VhiqdZHmJvhhvmD@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimmRcO2HLaZQ1SX9kmeByi-6VhiqdZHmJvhhvmD@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:29:36 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTimVtswTX1CijDKoBzGOpjS8QMvVdhYjGAPJJafU@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nerius Landys <nlandys@gmail.com>
To: Ed Flecko <edflecko@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Should I use the standard-supfile or stable-supfile?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:29:37 -0000

Hi everyone,
> I've installed Production Release 8.1 on a production server and I
> want to just track the errata branch, so should I use the
> standard-supfile or stable-supfile?
>
> Also, I want my supfile to read: tag=RELENG_8_1
>
> right?
>
>
You want standard-supfile for the security fixes for your release.

 For example on my 8.0 system:

*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8_0