From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 23 10:12:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64D816A4CE; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:12:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA7443D48; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:12:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (acs-24-154-239-203.zoominternet.net [24.154.239.203]) by pittgoth.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id hBNICAaJ077055; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:12:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:12:14 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes To: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <20031223131214.22c70b5f.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200312231743.hBNHhTIp041091@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> References: <200312231729.hBNHTZhB056790@repoman.freebsd.org> <200312231743.hBNHhTIp041091@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Tom Rhodes cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen sysconf.3 X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 18:12:14 -0000 On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:43:29 -0500 (EST) Garrett Wollman wrote: > < said: > > > trhodes 2003/12/23 09:29:35 PST > > FreeBSD src repository > > > Modified files: > > lib/libc/gen sysconf.3 > > Log: > > Document many of the missing posix.1b options. > > Unfortunately, many of these are wrong. For example: > > +.It Li _SC_FSYNC > +Return 1 if the system supports file synchronization, otherwise \-1. > > A brief examination of the source code (or, alternatively, the output > of `getconf _POSIX_FSYNC') will convince you that this is not the > case. My bad, I was informed by another committer that this patch was already reviewed offlist with the only comment being 'put them in order'. I'll revert this commit and just document them myself, though, I'm not too happy. Sorry for the inconvenience that this might have caused. -- Tom Rhodes