From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 15 16:01:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B4BE725; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 16:01:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h.highsecure.ru (mail6.highsecure.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:22a6::99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB4D2267D; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 16:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from medway.cl.cam.ac.uk (medway.cl.cam.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:212:238:21c:c0ff:fe4b:2b85]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: vsevolod@highsecure.ru) by h.highsecure.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFD893005EA; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 18:00:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <539DC348.1000106@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 17:01:12 +0100 From: Vsevolod Stakhov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Boris Samorodov , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r357891 - in head/ports-mgmt/pkg-devel: . files References: <201406151510.s5FFABjW090380@svn.freebsd.org> <539DBE5B.6000305@passap.ru> In-Reply-To: <539DBE5B.6000305@passap.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 16:01:16 -0000 On 15/06/14 16:40, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 15.06.2014 19:10, Vsevolod Stakhov пишет: >> Log: >> Update to 1.3.0.b4. >> >> With hat: pkg@ > > Previous commits to the port had some info about new features > and/or bugs fixed. That was very helpful. > What do we need is the good ChangeLog inside the source code. Probably, we should just generate it from git commits... -- Vsevolod Stakhov