From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 19 17:52:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FD01065674 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:52:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262D78FC1C for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:52:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m7JHqNv7077478; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:52:24 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080819125132.025dc130@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:52:16 -0500 To: "Derrick Ryalls" , "FreeBSD Questions" From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080819-0, 08/19/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/8058/Tue Aug 19 10:20:36 2008 on betty.computinginnovations.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: m7JHqNv7077478 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: sendmail secondary server routing to alternate port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:52:34 -0000 At 12:16 PM 8/19/2008, Derrick Ryalls wrote: >Greetings, > >I recently had to rebuild my brother's all in one box to get a SATA >controller working. It is now running 7.0 release and was previously >using courier and the mail system. With this rebuild, I have switched >him over to sendmail and most things are working, but I discovered a >small issue with sendmail that I am having trouble working out. As >well as being his own primary email server, he acts as secondary for a >couple of my domains, the tricky part is my ISP shut off port 25 >access to me (no, I am not a spammer) so I use port 587 for handling >mail. With courier, I was able to specify specific ports to >communicate with on a per domain basis. For example, if I was >relaying for example.org on port 2345, I would specify >example.org:2345 and that is the port it would use to talk to >example.org. > >Now that I have switched to sendmail, I don't see a way to set the >destination port on a per domain basis, only on an all or nothing >basis. Am I missing some piece of the documentation or is this an >actual limitation of sendmail? If you do nothing special, sendmail will handle both ports 587 and 25. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.