From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 18 15:33:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B96737B401 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 15:33:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 042.dsl6660142.ftth.surewest.net (042.dsl6660142.ftth.surewest.net [66.60.142.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD7343E75 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 15:33:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from anguiano@codesourcery.com) Received: (from anguiano@localhost) by 042.dsl6660142.ftth.surewest.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g9IMXOo10444; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 15:33:24 -0700 To: Chris BeHanna Cc: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Re: freebsd test matrix References: <20021018034039.F1275-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org> From: Ricardo Anguiano In-Reply-To: <20021018034039.F1275-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org> Date: 18 Oct 2002 15:33:23 -0700 Message-ID: Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Chris BeHanna writes: > The thing that bites you in the butt is test harnesses. > Invariably, the commonly-available (free) harnesses will lack > features desired by the QA team; therefore, they end up rolling > their own. In a volunteer project like this, that's a big, but > necessary, first step to take. Has anyone here tried QMTest? http://www.codesourcery.com/qm/qmtest I might be able to convince management that it's a good idea to work on FreeBSD testing. Is there any interest? Who would I contact (qa@freebsd?) to figure this out and try to get started? -- Ricardo Anguiano CodeSourcery, LLC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message