From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 8 17:13:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199BA16A420 for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 17:13:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from naseem@ironport.com) Received: from a50.ironport.com (a50.ironport.com [63.251.108.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760F543D5A for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 17:13:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from naseem@ironport.com) DomainKey-Signature: s=key512; d=ironport.com; c=nofws; q=dns; b=Wjye5ZsaQ6nI4hbNE9q0a/ebDL6qJcTjkfj/1TU+v8+Wjr3NcY8zxfXgT7mnoyBX2VNCYSsImwvmILzgWEo3lQ==; Received: from vader.ironport.com (HELO vader.ironportsystems.com) ([10.1.1.112]) by a50.ironport.com with ESMTP; 08 Oct 2005 10:13:32 -0700 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 10:13:26 -0700 Message-ID: <37EA3DB9B5B98C44A325E9DB561856E86343B4@vader.ironportsystems.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Good, stable gigabit nic? Thread-Index: AcXMHWTLs20YKKAEQE6hLESaS+F4kQADkJNe From: "Naseem A. Choudhury" To: "Mike Jakubik" , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: John Pettitt , stable@freebsd.org, Markus Trippelsdorf Subject: Re: Good, stable gigabit nic? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 17:13:44 -0000 We have had problems with BGE, but have had good luck with intel FXP and = EMO, but they are expensive. -naseem -----Original Message----- From: Mike Jakubik [mailto:mikej@rogers.com] Sent: Sat Oct 08 08:31:46 2005 To: jpeg@thilelli.net Cc: John Pettitt; stable@freebsd.org; Markus Trippelsdorf Subject: Re: Good, stable gigabit nic? On Sat, October 8, 2005 7:43 am, Julien Gabel wrote: >>> My gigabit nic has gone bad (after months of working just fine it's >>> saying "sk0 watchdog timeout" after a day or so of operation - temp = fix >>> is to reboot) - I'm looking for pointers for a low cos but = functional >>> gigabit PCI 32 card that runs under 5.4 without issues. What works = for >>> you? The Intel gigabit cards are quite good, 'man em' for details. As a = second choice, i would look in to a Broadcom based card, 'man bge' for that = one. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"