From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 22:23:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A922106564A for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 22:23:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt.thyer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86258FC17 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 22:23:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eye4 with SMTP id 4so1835882eye.31 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:23:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kSVU1T43AlR1gXirf6VV2+4ehCJDf1Jkxyp9olFitvY=; b=CM7d9xR0Qh9XmwVaa+Ofx3EVPaH5K/wSwR/os649NTRaRSlESoYqZ8ly8399/ZxCoA BzDgSz/1SxPmxecBoQU3yIXjv7ryxVWHHxwcu75bVFD7++Lfgis0cMV9TzE+dN7p8anG HNr6FcUXtv+PRu2WxPTjQDDc+Ebwlwm5eSW+s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.165.212 with SMTP id e62mr386669wel.87.1314915818628; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:23:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.39.80 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:23:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.39.80 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:23:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <24B9852A-8DE4-4BC6-9B55-2D74E414E31D@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 07:53:38 +0930 Message-ID: From: Matt Thyer To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Garrett Cooper , Jason Campbell , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems booting 9.0-BETA1 memstick X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 22:23:40 -0000 On Sep 2, 2011 5:25 AM, "Warren Block" wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> On Sep 1, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Matt Thyer wrote: >> >>> Shouldn't we use MBR partitioning instead of GPT for the memstick image ? > It seems wrong to have gptboot just ignore backup GPT data, but it could be an option. Can it actually do something if the backup GPT differs, or is it testing for an error that can't be handled? > > MBR didn't have backup data ("Luxury! Pure luxury!"), and it did okay. A custom hacked gptboot just for the memstick? Sorry.... Been working with Linux too much lately. Probably the real solution is to use MBR and have BSDinstall and the install kernel support UFS labels. Space on the memstick is not an issue.