From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 09:15:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF33416A41F for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:15:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9891913C458 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:15:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7121FFF02; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:15:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 86D6B1FFE82; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:15:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACD4444885; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:11:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:11:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: <46627FF2.6030404@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <20070603090620.Q38838@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <46620099.4080007@FreeBSD.org> <1438422832.20070603120837@citrin.ru> <46627FF2.6030404@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: BIND 9.4.1 imported X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 09:15:12 -0000 On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Doug Barton wrote: Hi, > Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: >> Hello Doug, >> >> You wrote on Sunday, June 3, 2007, 3:43:21 AM: >> >> DB> After extensive testing, I've upgraded the BIND in the base to version >> DB> 9.4.1. This version contains a lot of performance improvements, >> DB> especially for threading, so I've re-enabled it by default. >> >> Is there knobs to build bind without threads? > > I wasn't planning to add one, but if someone can show me convincing > proof that it's needed, I will be glad to do so. > > Why would you not want it to be threaded? I haven't checked which part (apart from named) might need libpthread (or equivalent). One thing comes to my mind: having installations without a thread library installed as in WITHOUT_LIBC_R= WITHOUT_LIBPTHREAD= WITHOUT_LIBTHR= (or whatever an up-to-date current would be). I remember that at least pppctl is one of the few other programs that needs a threading library in base. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT