From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 20 16:27:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE7D16A4CF; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:27:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2372343D48; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:27:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9KGRrMv050355; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:27:54 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <41769194.4060809@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:25:56 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040929 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jamie rishaw at google mail References: <41767CF1.2020005@FreeBSD.org> <6ff30abd04102008163115a32d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6ff30abd04102008163115a32d@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: Maxim Sobolev cc: current@freebsd.org cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:27:29 -0000 jamie rishaw at google mail wrote: > What are the performance implications of a debug kernel? > > Disk space really shouldnt even be an issue.. if it is, and its down > to the difference of 20 megs, well, duno. 512 meg CF's going for > sub-$50 .. the only reason i could see even a debate would be any > significant performance hits.. Disk space on the release CD images is at a premium, and putting debug kernels on there generally consumes 10-15MB that could be used by packages. Scott