From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 15:57:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4DB16A580 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:57:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC1E13C45E for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:57:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 69so1046781wra for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:57:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GswcvWxac5xU1OXDKMSQpqIhWHXN/12d/QkUQ+m8KBq2vUGqYfeaM2yjyIbcTwNPtEYEENpbws4+h2NkuEGETplRWEjpETKAVVmtLQUlA9Lr35h96SDhi3n8de+u2IL8u8obSCqn19tD8sTQu37xKWyM8u8/xb+ouwpZITtLsPM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=l2AOFXx9blCqxg/Q+H/OK8WZ7etmVG/ucmaSBlb3i9QH0wva3HWrNYDiyoFUCSWBkQeRm+nEc3E39P5WQ43T9H3PzwwZmA4Ni5Z93lYpkQJuEPQzVpdsX29ldF/7YFUgg3pH1JJ50cWP0y3LkoYBNUybtcudT6L6B7qiz+X/dEw= Received: by 10.100.225.13 with SMTP id x13mr3353233ang.1181059029865; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:57:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.9.14 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:57:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <499c70c0706050857i3f66cd14h19838c2e5229721f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 18:57:09 +0300 From: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" To: attilio@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <46653084.7080502@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <499c70c0706041119o6c290fb3k7f234492df2f6548@mail.gmail.com> <499c70c0706041441q4d4f13adtebd979ec87f71558@mail.gmail.com> <466488F0.9070802@FreeBSD.org> <499c70c0706041456x1a448348mec7410678c1f1d7d@mail.gmail.com> <46653084.7080502@FreeBSD.org> Cc: youshi10@u.washington.edu, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel C2D COREs not used equally in FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:57:10 -0000 On 6/5/07, Attilio Rao wrote: > Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > > Attilio, > > > > Thanks for explaining the issue deeper. > > > > So is fixing this issue would make FreeBSD runs apps faster than Linux > > or we will get the same result that linux offers now? > > This is not intended to improve the quickness of a program per-se (I'm > not saying it is impossible to happen, just that it would be a side > effect), but it is intended to improve scalabilty. > I expect a very good boost up on scalabilty for us by these jeff's > efforts, but quantify now is not very simple. Time will say better than me. > > Attilio I just did csup, and the CPU with 2 COREs usage looks better now, and things run really faster with SCHED_ULE Thank You Jeff, Kris, Attilio, and Jhb, beside the rest of the guys who made this possible :) -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/