From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 1 10:22:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A752B16A41F for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:22:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from massimo@cedoc.mo.it) Received: from insomma.datacode.it (ip-152-166.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.152.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD0843D46 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:22:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from massimo@cedoc.mo.it) Received: from localhost (localhost.datacode.it [127.0.0.1]) by insomma.datacode.it (Postfix) with SMTP id 456272C90B for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:22:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from insomma.datacode.it (localhost.datacode.it [127.0.0.1]) by insomma.datacode.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811952C90A for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:22:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from massimo.datacode.it (massimo.datacode.it [192.168.1.13]) by insomma.datacode.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D862C906 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:22:41 +0100 (CET) From: Massimo Lusetti To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: CEDOC - Modena Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 11:22:41 +0100 Message-Id: <1133432561.4306.16.camel@massimo.datacode.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Heavy loaded network machine X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:22:45 -0000 Due to the latest thread on em interrupt storm i would like to know which is the recommended nic to choose to be deployed on a -STABLE Read "recommended" as: which works good without known wired behavior and has produced good performance over a gigabit wire Ciao -- Massimo.run();