From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Nov 9 20:25:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE9537B401 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 20:25:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9D543E6E for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 20:25:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru) Received: from kuzbass.ru (kost [213.184.65.82]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gAA4PVNf018485; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 11:25:31 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru) Message-ID: <3DCDDFB1.D49327C6@kuzbass.ru> Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 11:25:21 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein Organization: SVZServ X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris BeHanna Cc: FreeBSD-Stable Subject: Re: backups of SUPERBLOCK References: <20021109231607.W9701-100000@topperwein.pennasoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > If you didn't do any custom tuning with newfs, it's likely that > > newfs -N -b 8192 -f 1024 # pre 4.6 > > or > > newfs -N -b 16384 -f 2048 # 4.6 and up > > will be sufficient. Yeah. But this system was set up in times when newfs did not optimize cyl/group ratio and I remember that I manually run newfs with -b, -f and -c flags. Should I now worry about recovering those values to get right output from newsf -N, or not? And if I should, how can I obtain all real values? Eugene Grosbein To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message