From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Oct 10 13:05:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA04430 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 13:05:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from elvis.vnet.net (elvis.vnet.net [166.82.1.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA04401; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 13:05:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rivers@dignus.com) Received: from ponds.dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by elvis.vnet.net (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP id QAA25648; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 16:04:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes [10.0.0.3]) by ponds.dignus.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA24147; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 16:13:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) id QAA09577; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 16:03:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 16:03:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <199710102003.QAA09577@lakes.dignus.com> To: rivers@dignus.com, sos@sos.freebsd.dk Subject: Re: LINUX emulation and uname(3). Cc: cracauer@cons.org, freebsd-emulation@freefall.FreeBSD.org, freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org, jlemon@americantv.com Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > In reply to Thomas David Rivers who wrote: > > > > > > NO, I think this is a bad idea. First off it _is_ not a Linux system, > > > second the next thing is you will have to report an os version. Now tell > > > me which of the bezillions Linux's versions are we going to call us then ? > > > And besides some programs uses this to tell other services which platform > > > they are running on, we dont want to advertise ourselves as Linux do we ?? > > > > > Well - I suppose it comes down to just how much of an emulation > > we want to be... That is, do we want to be able to run any Linux > > program; or some (admittedly large) subset of them? > > That should have nothing to do with it, but some vendors are just plain > stupid, and we shouldn't pad them on the shoudler for that. > > > Since there are many different variants of Linux emulation; I'd suggest > > we simply report our emulation version as the OS version. > > We allready do that, sort of.. > > > And - we would not be advertising ourselves as Linux; but simply > > being faithful to the emulation... > > That was NOT what I meant, certain programs uses the uname info to > log to other parties that they've "been there", we don't want the > statistics to be in favour of linux here, when it actually was a > FreeBSD system that made the connection. > It has nothing to do with fait, its hard facts :) I hadn't considered that - it does make a lot of sense... and, I agree with you... How 'bout a sysctl then, so people could adjust this if needed... - Dave Rivers - > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Søren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team > Even more code to hack -- will it ever end > ..