From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Dec 8 10:46:04 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA02329 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 10:46:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu (root@leibniz.math.psu.edu [146.186.130.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA02312 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 10:45:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from hausdorff.math.psu.edu (cross@hausdorff.math.psu.edu [146.186.132.5]) by leibniz.math.psu.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id NAA05395; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 13:45:47 -0500 Received: from localhost (cross@localhost) by hausdorff.math.psu.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id NAA09157; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 13:45:44 -0500 Message-Id: <199512081845.NAA09157@hausdorff.math.psu.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.4 10/10/95 To: Paul Richards cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard), hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A call for DNS secondaries to server for .freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 08 Dec 1995 15:51:46 GMT." <199512081551.PAA13026@cadair.elsevier.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 08 Dec 1995 13:45:43 -0500 From: Dan Cross Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Do other countries have similar namespace conventions? We could get all > the freebsd.org. domains allocated. This would reduce > namserver load on freebsd.org's nameservers because the top level > domain queries would go to the countries org nameserver and not > freebsd.org's. i.e queries to ftp.freebsd.org.uk will come to the uk. > > What do you think? I can get the domain name and a name server sorted > out but not the actual mirror sites, not enough bandwidth. I agree with this logic, it also fits in with the problem that Jordan mentioned regarding the existing freebsd.org stuff in the US. Why bother changing stuff around when there's an easier, and arguably more intuitive alternative? At anyrate, I'll gladly secondary for the US... - Dan C.