From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 18 15:39:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B6816A408 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:39:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rick@kiwi-computer.com) Received: from kiwi-computer.com (keira.kiwi-computer.com [63.224.10.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91D5E13C4BB for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:39:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rick@kiwi-computer.com) Received: (qmail 20813 invoked by uid 2001); 18 Apr 2007 15:39:20 -0000 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:39:20 -0500 From: "Rick C. Petty" To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070418153920.GA20441@keira.kiwi-computer.com> References: <55456.62.212.122.219.1176733664.squirrel@webmail.ledisez.net> <86ps64nzu3.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070416221842.GA56883@keira.kiwi-computer.com> <86bqhn9xl4.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070417161106.GA86245@keira.kiwi-computer.com> <86lkgplqg1.fsf@dwp.des.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86lkgplqg1.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: [ZFS] Problems with SATA disks (SET TRANSFERT MODE ...) X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rick-freebsd@kiwi-computer.com List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:39:22 -0000 On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 04:14:54PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > "Rick C. Petty" writes: > > The ideal solution is to figure out why the Promise doesn't properly > > reinitialize after a detach/attach.. if that's even possible. > > It shouldn't detach / attach in the first place. The primary issue > (in my view) is the DMA timeout. I completely agree that the DMA timeouts should be less sensitive to "disappearing drives" when in fact the drives are just fine. However, it can't hurt to fix the attach/detach problem also, because it's perfectly legitimate to hot-swap SATA drives. -- Rick C. Petty