From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 16 11:28:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26FF416A419; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:28:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF7613C4F5; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:28:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from bb.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.89]) by services.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1JQLDO-0008zx-Tw; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:28:18 +0300 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <20080213224717.GA59146@freebsd.org> <53884346@ipt.ru> <20080214091408.GA82434@freebsd.org> <43157302@serv3.int.kfs.ru> <20080214194358.5cjdxcll0gook8o8@webmail.leidinger.net> <96741075@bs1.sp34.ru> <20080216115948.485afc1d@deskjail> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:26:33 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20080216115948.485afc1d@deskjail> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Sat\, 16 Feb 2008 11\:59\:48 +0100") Message-ID: <39615478@bb.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux gnome libraries etc. X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:28:21 -0000 On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:59:48 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > I expect more problems for people which try to update without reading > UPDATING, and I expect that there need to be some additional logic in > bsd.port.mk. Plist handling and other things may be more messy. How do plan to introduce 2.6 as a default? First at HEAD, then MFC it or just leave it for 8.x only? > BTW: I don't like to have f7 or such in the port names, I think k26 > (like kernel 2.6) or 26e (like 2.6 emulation) would be better in the > long term. I like the latter. What about 26ke (2.6 kernel emulation)? Although it's one character longer... WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve