From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 17:03:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A2E5D13; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 17:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alto.onthenet.com.au (alto.OntheNet.com.au [203.13.68.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCBB933; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 17:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dommail.onthenet.com.au (dommail.OntheNet.com.au [203.13.70.57]) by alto.onthenet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B3C31263D; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 03:02:57 +1000 (EST) Received: from Peter-Grehans-MacBook-Pro-2.local ([64.245.0.210]) by dommail.onthenet.com.au (MOS 4.4.4-GA) with ESMTP id BYS74887 (AUTH peterg@ptree32.com.au); Sat, 4 Oct 2014 03:02:56 +1000 Message-ID: <542ED6BE.2060806@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 10:02:54 -0700 From: Peter Grehan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Allan Jude Subject: Re: VM unrestricted guest capability required References: <1412303890.698110582@f94.i.mail.ru> <1412310254.523165637@f125.i.mail.ru> <542E279D.8000804@freebsd.org> <1412312700.543372034@f141.i.mail.ru> <542ED2A4.1080009@freebsd.org> <542ED572.2040008@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <542ED572.2040008@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 17:03:00 -0000 Hi Allan, > If/When bhyve gets the UEFI boot stuff to be able to do 'any OS' (from > my understanding, this is the approach that will be used for Windows), > would that remove the requirement for UG to boot Linux, if it was booted > via UEFI? It cements the UG requirement even further: UEFI is a form of BIOS ROM, which requires starting the VM in x86 real-mode power-on state. later, Peter.