From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 10 19:17:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id 5DAF716A4CF; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:17:59 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:17:59 +0000 From: Kris Kennaway To: Denis Shaposhnikov Message-ID: <20050310191759.GI34206@hub.freebsd.org> References: <200503091838.06322.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <20050310004919.GA34206@hub.freebsd.org> <87ll8vn32j.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <20050310160852.GB1718@mail.crypta.net> <87sm33z55v.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87sm33z55v.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org cc: Andy Hilker Subject: Re: the current status of nullfs, unionfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:17:59 -0000 On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 10:12:28PM +0300, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote: > >>>>> "Andy" == Andy Hilker writes: > > >> nullfs is absolutely useless for jail's because TOO slow. > > Andy> What do you mean exactly, how do you benchmark this? > > Just ran build of databases/mysql41-server in a jail with nullfs > mounted /bin /sbin /lib etc over r/w nfs mounted sandbox. And compared it to what? What was your NFS setup? What measurements did you obtain? Kris