From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 4 09:54:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6600A16A41F for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 09:54:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@alastria.net) Received: from pigwidgeon.lancs.ac.uk (pigwidgeon.lancs.ac.uk [148.88.0.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AC543D5D for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 09:54:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@alastria.net) Received: from exchange-fe2.lancs.ac.uk ([148.88.1.23] helo=exchange-fe2.lancs.local) by pigwidgeon.lancs.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Eu5LO-0004It-F1 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 09:54:10 +0000 Received: from [148.88.132.153] ([148.88.132.153]) by exchange-fe2.lancs.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 09:54:09 +0000 Message-ID: <43BB9B5A.1030609@alastria.net> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 09:54:34 +0000 From: Peter Wood User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20051013) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jan 2006 09:54:09.0686 (UTC) FILETIME=[CF04E360:01C61114] Subject: Re: update on running FreeBSD on xen X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 09:54:12 -0000 Good Morning Kip et al, >The curious can track its status (known bugs, feature plans, release plans, >etc.) at: >http://www.fsmware.com/xenofreebsd/7.0/STATUS > > I've been watching this website since just before Christmas and have been somewhat excited by the progress you're making. I'm looking forward to the days of a FreeBSD dom0. I have a quick question about a comment in your STATUS file. You wrote: >PAE support will be a function of demand The server in particular have in mind is a dual Xeon which will take up to 16Gb of ram, I've been planning to upgrade it to 8Gb and put Xen on it. At which point (as I understand it) I would need PAE. From a selfish point of view I'd like to see PAE support for dom0 (I don't imagin allocating 4Gb+ to domUs). Thanks for all your work on this Kip, I wish I could help out, but unfortuantly I'm missing sufficent kernel clue, more then happy to be a guineepig though. Cheers, Pete.