From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 16 01:53:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA2C16A4CE; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 01:53:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (smtp01.uc3m.es [163.117.136.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40C243D3F; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 01:53:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrh@it.uc3m.es) Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925E8147B3; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:53:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.invalid (cimborrio.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.95]) by smtp01.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8B6147B0; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:53:36 +0100 (CET) From: Juan Rodriguez Hervella Organization: UC3M To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:53:34 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <20040315175559.GG755@saboteur.dek.spc.org> In-Reply-To: <20040315175559.GG755@saboteur.dek.spc.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200403161053.35142.jrh@it.uc3m.es> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 05:02:50 -0800 cc: Bruce M Simpson cc: current@freebsd.org cc: "Matthew N. Dodd" cc: Tim Robbins cc: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= cc: Mark Linimon Subject: Re: RFC: doscmd removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:53:38 -0000 On Monday 15 March 2004 18:55, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 12:53:38AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > > Mark Linimon writes: > > > So, you'll be submitting the patches to install it to the ports > > > tree, then? > > > > Yes. > > Excellent. I use doscmd for certain things such as running flash and > BIOS related tools. I'd be happy to see it 'bumped down' to ports status. > I think doscmd works very well, I've been playing with it a couple of days, and its great. The pity is that it doesn't have support for int13, which is used by most of the old MS_DOS games (like Prince of Persia, my favourite). If it's going to be well mantained, I would prefer to see it on the ports collection, but on the other hand I wouldn't like to see this program dissapear from FreeBSD at all. I've never tested it with flash utilities and such (Im afraid of upgrading my flash :), but I think it is a useful thing to have, either on the base system or in the ports. Regards.