From owner-freebsd-security Mon Jan 3 5:24:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FACC15353 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2000 05:24:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA08343; Mon, 3 Jan 2000 14:24:05 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id OAA06498; Mon, 3 Jan 2000 14:24:05 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 14:24:05 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund To: Philip Hands Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG, openssh-unix-dev@mindrot.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal Message-ID: <20000103142405.C6173@bitbox.follo.net> References: <20000101235721.A15256@alcove.wittsend.com> <20000102061545.A1691@rumpole.bohemians.lexington.ky.us> <20000102151208.A21548@folly.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <87g0wfmht0.fsf@sheikh.hands.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <87g0wfmht0.fsf@sheikh.hands.com>; from phil@hands.com on Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 01:00:11PM +0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 01:00:11PM +0000, Philip Hands wrote: > Markus Friedl writes: > > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 06:15:48AM -0500, David Rankin wrote: > > > Speaking completely without facts, I am personally skeptical about > > > enhancing the 1.x protocol when all of the standards processes are > > > focused on getting 2.0 out the door. That said, I am willing to be > > > convinced on the matter. > > > > i have put the latest revisions of my SSH 1.6 patches to > > http://wwwcip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~msfriedl/openssh/ > > Quick question. Does this fall foul of this clause in the license: > > Any derived versions of this software must be clearly marked as > such, and if the derived work is incompatible with the protocol > description in the RFC file, it must be called by a name other than > "ssh" or "Secure Shell". IANAL - but in my interpretation, no. It stays compatible; it just can negotiate higher security. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message