From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 14 15:21:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1249016A4CE for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 15:21:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.struchtrup.de (mail.struchtrup.de [80.190.247.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E36943D3F for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 15:21:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sebastian@struchtrup.de) Received: from p5087ccb4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([80.135.204.180] helo=[10.0.0.2]) by mail.struchtrup.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CI7Rs-0005du-SW; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 15:23:25 +0000 Message-ID: <416E9A78.80305@struchtrup.de> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:25:44 +0200 From: Sebastian Schulze Struchtrup User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20041013) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Laszlo References: <416C0DE8.3000004@struchtrup.com> <416C35A5.4040703@vonostingroup.com> <20041013123840.GB1301@FreeBSD.org> <20041013193432.GA53895@hub.freebsd.org> <416DAB52.5070404@struchtrup.com> <416DAD75.7000504@vonostingroup.com> <416DB213.3020708@struchtrup.com> <20041014095355.GA61134@elendil.ru> <20041014135041.GB4625@iib.unsam.edu.ar> <416E891E.8070003@vonostingroup.com> In-Reply-To: <416E891E.8070003@vonostingroup.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Struchtrup-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Struchtrup-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: sebastian@struchtrup.de cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: alternative options for ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 15:21:35 -0000 Frank Laszlo wrote: > That way a user could just type something like 'make listoptions' and > it will give a nice list of build options > for a specific port. Anyone have any feedback on this? I think this would be nice. For users who scare of looking into Makefiles as well as for others who do not. It is not required to have, but nice. With a standard framework for options, this list could be generated automatically (Regardless of using the menu-based config of not) and would not require a separate file. But this would require all ports to use this and a global switch to disable the menu-based config for those who don't like it. As someone other has told us (I've seen this too, somewhere) this is implemented by a few ports, but rather with pre-everything and not as a separate target. But I think there is a port which defines a separate target, like show-options. Don't know which one. Regards Sebastian