From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 13 16:51:43 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F9474E8
 for <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org>; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 16:51:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu
 [128.95.76.21])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "troutmask.apl.washington.edu",
 Issuer "troutmask.apl.washington.edu" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8502E04
 for <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org>; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 16:51:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu
 [127.0.0.1])
 by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8DGpZpg001593
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
 Sat, 13 Sep 2014 09:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: (from sgk@localhost)
 by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s8DGpZ2e001592;
 Sat, 13 Sep 2014 09:51:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk)
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 09:51:35 -0700
From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@vlakno.cz>
Subject: Re: status of clang on sparc64?
Message-ID: <20140913165135.GA1572@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References: <20140912000406.GA83874@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <20140913082322.GA76218@vlakno.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140913082322.GA76218@vlakno.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain
 <freebsd-toolchain.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-toolchain>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-toolchain-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-toolchain/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-toolchain-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-toolchain-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 16:51:43 -0000

On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:23:22AM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 05:04:06PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > What's the current status for running clang on sparc64?
> 
> Last time we played with this (february?) it was able to compile
> a seemingly working world. So I guess it's not that terribly broken.
> 
> We didnt test that much stuff though.
> 
> > In particular, flame.freebsd.org is running 10.1-PRERELEASE
> > compiled with gcc 4.2.1.  Any chance that clanf can be
> > made available on flame?
> 
> I think your best bet is to compile it on flame yourself or crosscompile
> world for sparc64 and use it on flame.
> 

Was your testing with the in-tree llvm/clang or upstream?
Should I try to compile lang/clang35 or lang/clang-devel?

My main (and perhaps only) interest is to test the ld128
math libraries functions that I've been writing.

-- 
Steve