From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Aug 30 14:57:06 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA29014 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 30 Aug 1996 14:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from TomQNX.tomqnx.com (pma12.comnet.ca [205.206.213.62]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA29001 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 1996 14:57:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tomqnx.tomqnx.com by TomQNX.tomqnx.com with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #1) id m0uwbah-00082JC; Fri, 30 Aug 96 17:59 EDT Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 17:59:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Tom Torrance To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: New routed Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I'm having heartburn with the new routed, which appears to be unusable with ijppp -auto. It INSISTS on deleting the default route. Am I just doing something wrong? I thought about setting an alias to my nameserver(s) on tun0. Would that be an effective work-around? The next traffic after a hangup should be a DNS request, the routing of which will open the new connection over which the traffic will flow. I will try it out. -- tom@tomqnx.com Tom Torrance 27 Dayton Cr., Nepean Ont., Canada K2H 7N8 My opinions are personal, and not those of my employer.