From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 4 18:08:09 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4FCB16A46B for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 18:08:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-bugs@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E49113C4E3 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 18:08:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-bugs@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IzbuE-0005wl-4P for freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:50:02 +0000 Received: from 26.red-80-26-83.staticip.rima-tde.net ([80.26.83.26]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:50:02 +0000 Received: from sfandino by 26.red-80-26-83.staticip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:50:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org From: Salvador Fandino Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:41:09 +0100 Lines: 16 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 26.red-80-26-83.staticip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071009) Sender: news Subject: sysinstall stalls at "Located INDEX..." (FreeBSD 7.0-Beta3-sparc64) X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:08:09 -0000 Hi, I am trying to install FreeBSD 7.0-Beta3 in a SunBlade 100 (mem: 512MB, cpu: 500MHz), but the installation process stalls at the "Located INDEX, now reading package data from it..." screen. Running top in another console shows that CPU consumption at that screen goes slowly increasingly from a few percent to 99%. It looks like if a non-linear cost algorithm was used to process the index. I have tried to install a couple of times with different package configuration (mostly all and x-user) with the same result. Cheers, - Salva