From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 29 18:23:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD1A16A41F; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:23:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC4143D48; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:23:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 3A2DB2BEA; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:23:41 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:23:41 -0500 To: Michael Nottebrock Message-ID: <20050929182341.GB26145@soaustin.net> References: <200509291337.j8TDbiAb025573@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050929175106.GA24423@soaustin.net> <200509292011.40084.lofi@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200509292011.40084.lofi@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: Mark Linimon , cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/lplayer/files patch-src_lpformsearchbase.ui ports/cad/qfsm/files patch-src_SimulatorDlg.ui ports/deskutils/tuxcards/files patch-src_gui_dialogs_optionsDialog-IOptionsDialog.ui ports/devel/esvn/files patch-.ui-frm_main.ui ports/devel/lincvs/files patch-src-AnnotateDialog.ui patch-src-CheckoutDialog.ui patch-src-LogDialog.ui ... X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:23:42 -0000 On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 08:11:36PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > How would it make it difficult, exactly? If there were a security update needed in one of these ports, how many other ports would be affected? e.g. how many different dependent ports would need to be back-merged? That should be the test. Without looking at each part of your commit I can't really tell that. mcl