From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug  3 14:55:41 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1C6106566B
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue,  3 Aug 2010 14:55:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
Received: from cp-out9.libero.it (cp-out9.libero.it [212.52.84.109])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4708FC0C
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue,  3 Aug 2010 14:55:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from soth.ventu (151.51.20.251) by cp-out9.libero.it (8.5.107)
	id 4C4029D1030AD312 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org;
	Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:55:39 +0200
Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18])
	by soth.ventu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o73Etcr1015992
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:55:38 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
Message-ID: <4C582DEB.1000105@netfence.it>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:55:39 +0200
From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; it-IT;
	rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100724 Thunderbird/3.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: CARP over LAGG
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 14:55:41 -0000

Hello.

On a couple of 7.2 systems, I've got some carp interfaces build upon a 
physical interface (em0 or igb0) and everything works fine.

On both box I've tried aggregating two interfaces (resp. em0+em1 and 
igb0+igb1) into a lagg0 interface, using LACP.
However, in this case CARP will stop working as all carp devices which 
work over lagg0 will stay in INIT state.

Is this a bug?
Is "carp over lagg" possible at all?

  bye & Thanks
	av.