From owner-freebsd-java Wed Jul 10 21:49:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529DF37B407 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:49:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A051143E42 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:49:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: from emerger.yogotech.com (emerger.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA29358; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:49:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by emerger.yogotech.com (8.12.5/8.12.3) id g6B4n8a6015265; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:49:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate) From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15661.3652.734594.522357@emerger.yogotech.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:49:08 -0600 To: Bill Huey Cc: Nate Williams , freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 1.3.1 patchset 7 not quite ready In-Reply-To: <20020711044606.GA4375@gnuppy.monkey.org> References: <20020710234814.GE2394@gnuppy.monkey.org> <15660.64672.311655.234760@emerger.yogotech.com> <20020711035137.GA4210@gnuppy.monkey.org> <15661.575.854309.132871@emerger.yogotech.com> <20020711044606.GA4375@gnuppy.monkey.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > Signals 'mostly work' in -current, regardless of what they do in > > HotSpot. You may end up chasing your tail trying to fix Java bugs that > > are in fact kernel bugs. > > I'm competent enought to know the differences between those bugs. Julian (the person we get to blame for these bugs) can't determine why sometimes it works and other times it doesn't, so I'm suprised you are so confident in your ability to differentiate between kernel 'signal' bugs and JVM bugs. > What you've said is valid except that the solution is a backport of libc_r. > > > Fair enough. Does Dan know exactly what parts of libc_r need to be > > merged back in? Can you help him out there, so that the changes are > > made back to -stable, so that other developers (and users) can get a > > chance at HotSpot? That would be a temporary setback for you as far as > > bit-twiddling and such, but it would bring the project and other > > developers much further ahead. > > Dan shouldn't be doing that stuff either, he's got other crazy stuff to > worry about. I was hoping that somebody else in this project would take > that task on. Dan *owns* libc_r. If it's done to libc_r, he's the man to commit the changes after reviewing them. If you want the changes backported, then Dan is the man to do it. If you want it done sooner, let him know what needs to be done, (providing patches, pointers, etc..) Otherwise, it won't get done. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message