From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Sep 6 19:59:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA03036 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sun, 6 Sep 1998 19:59:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from hoek@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA03027; Sun, 6 Sep 1998 19:59:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hoek) Message-ID: <19980906195915.A29724@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1998 19:59:15 -0700 From: Tim Vanderhoek To: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/misc/magicpoint Makefile References: <19980906191936.A28469@freebsd.org> <7897.905135091@coconut.itojun.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <7897.905135091@coconut.itojun.org>; from Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh on Mon, Sep 07, 1998 at 11:24:51AM +0900 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Sep 07, 1998 at 11:24:51AM +0900, Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh wrote: > > >Elf fixes), any reference to NOMANCOMPRESS from port/Makefile is > >almost certainly an error. > >It would be pretty easy to make portlint check for that. :-) > > i'm workring on it, but right now it looks that NetBSD/FreeBSD > OpenBSD uses very different rule for manpage, and portlint is > becoming unraedable. Yes/No. On OpenBSD, USE_IMAKE implies MANCOMPRESSED=no because, as far as anyone has determined, imake installs uncompressed manpages on OpenBSD. Other than that, the only difference is that OpenBSD always has NOMANCOMPRESS defined. Provided they've merged our latest bsd.port.mk (+MLINKS), none of them (FreeBSD, NetBSD, or OpenBSD) should refer to NOMANCOMPRESS. [Obvious caveat here, is that there is no date set for a merge...] I think NetBSD uses MANZ instead of NOMANCOMPRESS, so the rule could be "No port/Makefile should refer to either MANZ or NOMANCOMPRESS". Right now, I think both Open and Net are at r.1.264 from our bsd.port.mk. There are some changes from both that we should consider merging. The catch here, of course, is that someone's got to merge first, or our bsd.port.mk files are going to become forever split. [Insert assorted curses here about NetBSD not having their cvs repo open... They're definately at risk of making more work for themselves because of this...] Incidentally, imho NetBSD took some small wrong turns in their copy and will need to back-up a little. OpenBSD is pretty good, but I have some questions about their "plist" and "COMES_WITH" features. -- Me. Who'd you think sent this? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message