From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 29 19:01:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA8C16A420; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:01:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BB843D4C; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:01:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 7EC152D63; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:01:30 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:01:30 -0500 To: Michael Nottebrock Message-ID: <20050929190130.GA27024@soaustin.net> References: <200509291337.j8TDbiAb025573@repoman.freebsd.org> <200509292011.40084.lofi@freebsd.org> <20050929182341.GB26145@soaustin.net> <200509292039.39236.lofi@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200509292039.39236.lofi@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: Mark Linimon , cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/lplayer/files patch-src_lpformsearchbase.ui ports/cad/qfsm/files patch-src_SimulatorDlg.ui ports/deskutils/tuxcards/files patch-src_gui_dialogs_optionsDialog-IOptionsDialog.ui ports/devel/esvn/files patch-.ui-frm_main.ui ports/devel/lincvs/files patch-src-AnnotateDialog.ui patch-src-CheckoutDialog.ui patch-src-LogDialog.ui ... X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:01:31 -0000 On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 08:39:34PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > However, I'm afraid that others have indeed (potentially) made life difficult > for RE in that respect - one commit I can think of would be the recent > libxine update which bumps the major shared library revision and thus affects > a great deal of dependent ports. That's a perfect example of things that need to be run by portmgr@ during thaws. If it had, I would have voted against approving it. (I had not noticed it earlier in all the email messages). My own feeling is that we had better hope that we don't have to do any ports tag slipping this release, since we have accumulated over 4 weeks' worth of commits to the tree since the freeze ended. If we do, my guess is that we're at a pretty high risk of having to re-freeze the tree and rebuild all the packages. mcl