From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 26 17:36:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40EC16A4CE for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 17:36:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6C143D55 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 17:35:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) j1QHa984045748; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:36:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: vova@fbsd.ru In-Reply-To: <1109419564.1942.10.camel@localhost> References: <1109419564.1942.10.camel@localhost> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-SX8YoPJDDhQtXcckDve0" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:35:25 -0500 Message-Id: <1109439325.53375.9.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How does GNOME 2.9.x in MarcusCom treats you so far? X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 17:36:00 -0000 --=-SX8YoPJDDhQtXcckDve0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 15:06 +0300, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > =B2 =DF=E2, 25/02/2005 =D2 17:21 -0600, Jeremy Messenger =DF=D8=E8=D5=E2: > >Hello folks, > > > >I want to collect the feedbacks for GNOME 2.9.x in MarcusCom only under = =20 > >this thread. I would like to know how it treats to you so far. If there = is =20 > >something in FreeBSD ports that will not working with GNOME 2.9.x, then = =20 > >please report under this thread too. For like example menu doesn't visib= le =20 > >in GNOME 2.9.x, mimetype, will not build and etc. > > > >The known issue for me so far: >=20 > More issues: >=20 > - Evolution works bad on high dpi > http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D72959 (very hard to use) > - Every login after fresh boot one of two my panel is hidden (no hide > configured) and appears when I cross another panel boundary by mouse. > After relogin - all works ok, I have no idea how to dig it. This doesn't really make sense, and I have never seen this behavior on my two GNOME 2.9 test machines. What happens when you create a clean account and login there? > - Evolution does not handles mime-types as it is done by nautilus. Yeah, I've seen this too. Have you opened a bug on this? > - KDE menu items is mixed with gnome menu items and most kde items has > no icons. Hopefully Mezz will step up here. > - Old customized menu items (added into /usr/X11R6/share/gnome/apps) do > not visible now. Known issue: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D167934 > - multimedia/mpeg4ip fails to install Where is the failure log? > - wireless applet shows invalid signal strength for iwi interface=20 > (it shows about 185% for me) Support for this card was added without being tested (due to lack of hardware). Patches or hardware donations are welcome. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-SX8YoPJDDhQtXcckDve0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCILNdb2iPiv4Uz4cRAnrMAJ9RJl588MivXQNyGYHVA3a5pY4lDwCglEo6 MEIuPy0mjMFGTt9ldZwPz6M= =zpBr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-SX8YoPJDDhQtXcckDve0--