From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jul 22 8:36:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rebel.net.au (rebel.rebel.net.au [203.20.69.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 752DD151FF for ; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 08:36:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kkenn@rebel.net.au) Received: from 203.20.69.80 (dialup-10.rebel.net.au [203.20.69.80]) by rebel.net.au (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP id BAA26282 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 01:06:02 +0930 Received: (qmail 59402 invoked from network); 22 Jul 1999 15:36:02 -0000 Received: from localhost (kkenn@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Jul 1999 15:36:02 -0000 Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 01:06:00 +0930 (CST) From: Kris Kennaway Reply-To: kkenn@rebel.net.au To: Dominic Mitchell Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PAM & LDAP in FreeBSD, and userfs too. In-Reply-To: <19990722160337.D50365@palmerharvey.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > This is starting to get icky. This is also where the earlier idea of a > userspace filesystem would probably fare better, in terms of both > performance and simplicity. Maybe I don't get how this userspace filesystem is going to be set out (for the case of the nss stuff), but I don't see this. Kris ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Feynman Problem-Solving Algorithm: (1) Write down the problem (2) Think real hard (3) Write down the answer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message