From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Aug 30 21:37:18 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA19336 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 30 Aug 1996 21:37:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orion.webspan.net (root@orion.webspan.net [206.154.70.41]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA19331 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 1996 21:37:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (gpalmer@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.webspan.net (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id AAA11090; Sat, 31 Aug 1996 00:35:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: orion.webspan.net: Host gpalmer@localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Tom Torrance cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org From: "Gary Palmer" Subject: Re: New routed In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 30 Aug 1996 17:59:02 EDT." Date: Sat, 31 Aug 1996 00:35:53 -0400 Message-ID: <11086.841466153@orion.webspan.net> Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Tom Torrance wrote in message ID : > I'm having heartburn with the new routed, which appears to be > unusable with ijppp -auto. It INSISTS on deleting the > default route. My advice is to NEVER run routed (even -q) when you are using iijppp. It will cause problems. If it's worked in the past, count yourself lucky. It bites a LOT of people. In 99.9999999999% of cases there is no requirement for routed anyhow. Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info