From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Aug 2 9:28:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CEF737B400; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 09:28:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wall.polstra.com (wall-gw.polstra.com [206.213.73.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2D743E86; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 09:28:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g72GS8g39639; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 09:28:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@vashon.polstra.com) Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g72GS8qL048171; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 09:28:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp) Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 09:28:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200208021628.g72GS8qL048171@vashon.polstra.com> To: stable@freebsd.org From: John Polstra Cc: bmah@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tcp checksum MFS requerst In-Reply-To: <200208021624.g72GO7q1012279@intruder.bmah.org> References: <20020802134108.P86866-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> <200208021624.g72GO7q1012279@intruder.bmah.org> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <200208021624.g72GO7q1012279@intruder.bmah.org>, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > --==_Exmh_-1520295196P > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > If memory serves me right, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > > > do you object of MFSing jdp's fix from 1 Jul 2002 to > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.17.2.3 +15 -10 src/sys/i386/i386/in_cksum.c > > 1.7.2.2 +15 -12 src/sys/i386/include/in_cksum.h > > > > into RELENG_4_6 ? > > So as I understand this change, it just allows these files to be built > with higher optimization levels, but without changing functionality in > any way. Exactly. > I'm somewhat opposed to merging this fix to RELENG_4_6, as it doesn't > seem to be anywhere near the same magnitude as the commits that have > gone into RELENG_4_6. The other changes are fixes for security > advisories or fairly major regressions of functionality (such as the > ata(4) driver fixes). > > I think it'd be a nice fix to have, but if we merged in every "nice to > have" change, we'd basically end up with a new, full release. That > release (4.7) isn't due out for another couple of months. I agree. John -- John Polstra John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message