From owner-freebsd-hardware Tue Jul 7 08:49:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA16716 for freebsd-hardware-outgoing; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 08:49:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from symbion.srrc.usda.gov ([199.78.118.118]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA16711 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 08:49:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glenn@nola.srrc.usda.gov) Received: from nola.srrc.usda.gov (localhost.srrc.usda.gov [127.0.0.1]) by symbion.srrc.usda.gov (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA16961 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 1998 10:49:20 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from glenn@nola.srrc.usda.gov) Message-Id: <199807071549.KAA16961@symbion.srrc.usda.gov> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG From: Glenn Johnson Subject: Intel EtherExpress Pro 100 Server vs. client adapter Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 07 Jul 1998 10:49:20 -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I have convinced our network administrator to set up a FreeBSD server and I am recommending that he install an Intel EtherExpress Pro 100 NIC. When I visited the Intel web page, I saw that they have both Server adapter and Client adapter versions of the board. Are any of the extra features of the Server version usable under FreeBSD, or should we get the Client adapter version and save money? Thanks in advance. -- Glenn Johnson Technician USDA, ARS, SRRC New Orleans, LA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message