From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 12 20:37:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B353716A41F for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:37:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237CC43D45 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:37:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j8CKbCVV066960; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:37:12 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <4325E6F9.3020108@samsco.org> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:37:13 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050615 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Hunter References: <43245C91.1090904@comcast.net> <4324697A.40301@samsco.org> <20050912203242.GA53403@malcolm.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <20050912203242.GA53403@malcolm.berkeley.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with Nacona Xeons X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:37:18 -0000 Mike Hunter wrote: > On Sep 11, "Scott Long" wrote: > > >>Sean wrote: >> >>>David S. Besade wrote: > > >>>>I have a Dual Xeon (With EM64T) system running FreeBSD 5.4 AMD64 - >>>>Release (with a -stable kernel). I can't get the kernel to see my >>>>second CPU. I have recompiled and retuned and done everything I could >>>>to get it to see the second CPU. The guys on IRC (##Freebsd on >>>>freenode) told me to post this to this list. > > >>>>I do have the ACPI disabled as it doesn't work right yet. The >>>>Motherboard is a Tyan S5350 ( >>>>http://tyan.com/products/html/tigeri7320.html ) running with 2 Dual >>>>Nacona Core Xeons. I had the datacenter check the BIOS and everything >>>>is as it should be. I have Registered ECC RAM on it as well. > > >>>>Both CPU's were recogized by Centos 4.1 X86-64, however I prefer FBSD >>>>to anything Linux. So if you guys could help me out I would appreciate >>>>it. I think I have given you all the relevant information I Hope but >>>>if not just ask me I will get it. > > >>>You said you did a kernel recompile, so did you include >>>'device acpi' >> >> ^^^^ >>You need 'device apic' here also. There is a difference between 'acpi' >>and 'apic. For SMP amd64 machines, you should have both. Simply put, >>the apic is what allows the first CPU to start up the other CPUs during >>boot. > > > I thought apic was "built in" to amd64...? > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041208074109.GB35079 Gah! You're right. It's atpic that has to be explicitely included. Sorry for the bad info. Scott