From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Nov 12 08:16:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA23950 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 08:16:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gamefish.pcola.gulf.net (gamefish.pcola.gulf.net [198.69.72.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA23876 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 08:15:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from psalzman@gamefish.pcola.gulf.net) Received: from localhost (psalzman@localhost) by gamefish.pcola.gulf.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA04037; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 16:15:24 GMT (envelope-from psalzman@gamefish.pcola.gulf.net) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 16:15:23 +0000 (GMT) From: Phillip Salzman To: Lukman Salim cc: "Tom T. Thai" , FreeBSD-isp Subject: Re: Using NAT for ISP customer In-Reply-To: <364A5E05.E94B00A2@usa.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Don't use -SNAP, use -RELEASE --- its a little better than the -SNAPS -- Phillip Salzman On Thu, 12 Nov 1998, Lukman Salim wrote: > Hmm, I don't get your question. It's a standard Hybrid Fiber Coax > implementation. Currently we will deploy mainly in residential area. > We'll be using an MCNS (an industry standard) or similar system. > > Didn't mention it before, we're in Jakarta, Indonesia. The fibers are > from the state telco. Sorry for the diversion. > > BTW, because of the NIC that I use (3c905b: the xl driver) I had to use > a SNAP release kernel. Is it safe to use on a production server? Any > suggestions? > > > Tom T. Thai wrote: > > > > just curious, how are you getting the cable lines? > > > > .............. .................................... > > Thomas T. Thai Infomedia Interactive Communications > > tom@iic.net TEL 612.376.9090 * FAX 612.376.9087 > > > > On Thu, 12 Nov 1998, Lukman Salim wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I will be starting a cable-modem based ISP in the near future. Because > > > of the potential concurrent online user among the cable modem user would > > > be a lot greater than traditional ISP, I'm thinking of using local IP > > > with NAT for those who don't need real IP. Has anyone had any experience > > > with such a scheme using FreeBSD's natd? I know that some apps would not > > > run, but does the majority of Internet user use such software? > > > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > > > Lukman > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message